A few months ago, a founder came to us with a genuinely interesting business... Great product, real traction, paying customers. They had everything – except a story anyone wanted to write about.
Their pitch to media started with: "We are a B2B SaaS platform disrupting the workflow automation space." I could almost hear the delete key... and the yawn from the journalists receiving the pitch... from here.
Here is the thing most founders get wrong about PR: journalists do not write about companies. They write about people. They write about tension, stakes, turning points, and hard-won lessons. If your story reads like a LinkedIn bio or an investor deck, it will not land – no matter how good your product is.
After nearly a decade of pitching stories to New Zealand and international media, this is what I have learned about telling a founder story that journalists actually want to run.
Your Story Is Not Your Biography
The most common mistake founders make is confusing a timeline with a narrative. They list milestones: founded the company in 2019, raised a seed round, launched version two, hired a team. That is a CV, not a story.
A story needs an arc. It needs a moment where something changed – where you saw a problem no one else was solving, or where something went wrong and forced you to rethink everything. Journalists recognise this because it mirrors how they write. Problem, unconventional solution, breakthrough. That is the shape of a story worth telling.
When we worked with Cover on the launch of Kane Williamson's sports protection brand, the story was not "former cricketer launches product." The story was: in 2012, a Dale Steyn delivery split Williamson's box in half during a Test match, and that single moment sparked a years-long mission to redesign a product category that had not meaningfully evolved in decades. That is specific. That is vivid. That is a yarn journalists want to tell.
What Makes a Founder Story Compelling
After pitching hundreds of founder stories to newsrooms across New Zealand and beyond, three things consistently separate the stories that land from the ones that get ignored.
Specificity beats polish. Vague claims about "disrupting" an industry mean nothing. A founder who can point to the exact moment, conversation, or frustration that started everything – that is gold. The more specific you are, the more credible and interesting you become. Generic stories feel like marketing. Specific ones feel true.
Vulnerability is a strategy, not a weakness. Research from Equations PR found that founders who share personal struggles in their media pitches create stories journalists actually want to cover. Admitting what you got wrong, what nearly broke you, or what you are still figuring out – that is what makes people lean in. In a world full of polished brand messaging, honesty is the most disruptive thing you can do.
Stakes make it matter. Why does this need to exist? What happens if it does not work? Who loses? If your story has no tension, it has no urgency. And if it has no urgency, a journalist has no reason to run it today instead of never.
The Difference Between a Good Story and a Good Pitch
Having a compelling founder story is only half the job. You also need to understand what makes it relevant right now – and to whom.
Recent research shows that 88% of journalists immediately disregard a pitch that does not match their coverage area. That means even the best founder story in the world will die in an inbox if it is sent to the wrong person.
A good pitch connects your story to something bigger – a trend, a shift, a cultural moment. When we helped Contented announce their $4.1 million seed round, the story was not just about the funding. It was about two female founders building a world-class AI company from Christchurch – at a time when the conversation around AI, women in tech, and regional innovation was front of mind for every business journalist in the country. The narrative had layers, and each layer gave a different journalist a reason to care.
If you are not sure whether your story has that kind of relevance, read our guide on how to tell if your story is actually news before you pitch it.
Five Mistakes That Kill Founder Stories
We see these constantly – and they are all fixable.
- Leading with the product instead of the person. Journalists want to meet the human first. What drove you to build this? What did you sacrifice? What keeps you up at night? Lead with that.
- Being too polished. If your story sounds like it was written by AI, it will feel inauthentic. The best founder stories have rough edges – moments of doubt, early failures, lessons that came the hard way.
- Trying to be everything to everyone. A story that appeals to every journalist appeals to none of them. Pick an angle and commit to it. A targeted pitch to 25 journalists who actually cover your space will outperform a blast to 500 every single time.
- Burying the interesting part. If the most compelling moment in your story is three paragraphs in, move it to the top. Journalists decide in seconds whether something is worth reading... Do not make them dig for the good stuff.
- Confusing scale with significance. A story does not have to be massive to be newsworthy. When we worked with FTN Motion on the launch of their Streetdog80 electric motorbike, the story resonated not because of the company's size, but because of the founder's conviction – a Hamilton-based manufacturer proving that New Zealand could lead in urban electric mobility. That is a small story told with big meaning.
How to Find Your Story (A Simple Exercise)
If you are sitting there thinking "I do not have a compelling story," you probably do – you just have not framed it yet. Try this:
Ask yourself three questions:
- What moment made you start this? Not the business case. The actual human moment. The frustration, the experience, the conversation that made you think: someone needs to fix this.
- What did you risk or sacrifice? Did you leave a safe career? Bet your savings? Move cities? Turn down easier money? Sacrifice creates stakes, and stakes create stories.
- What do you believe that most people in your industry do not? Contrarian conviction is magnetic. If you have a genuine point of view that challenges the status quo, that is often the most interesting thing about you.
Write down your answers in plain language – not marketing language. Then read them back. Somewhere in there is the nucleus of a story a journalist would actually want to write.
The Bigger Picture
In 2026, the media landscape has shifted. Coverage is increasingly moving from brand-centric messaging to human-centric storytelling – founder interviews, expert opinions, behind-the-scenes business narratives. At the same time, journalists are drowning in AI-generated pitches that all sound the same. The bar for getting noticed has never been higher, but the bar for standing out has never been clearer: be specific, be honest, and be human.
Your founder story is your most underrated marketing asset. It is the one thing your competitors cannot copy. It is what turns a transactional customer relationship into something people genuinely root for. And it is what gives a journalist a reason to write about you instead of the other 200 pitches in their inbox.
If you are a New Zealand founder or startup looking to get your story into the media – and you want someone who will tell you honestly whether it is ready – we would love to hear from you.
Get in touch here and we'll give you a straight answer.
FEATURED ARTICLE
6 MIN READ
How to Tell Your Founder Story (So Journalists Actually Care)
View Article
A few months ago, a founder came to us with a genuinely interesting business... Great product, real traction, paying customers. They had everything – except a story anyone wanted to write about.
Their pitch to media started with: "We are a B2B SaaS platform disrupting the workflow automation space." I could almost hear the delete key... and the yawn from the journalists receiving the pitch... from here.
Here is the thing most founders get wrong about PR: journalists do not write about companies. They write about people. They write about tension, stakes, turning points, and hard-won lessons. If your story reads like a LinkedIn bio or an investor deck, it will not land – no matter how good your product is.
After nearly a decade of pitching stories to New Zealand and international media, this is what I have learned about telling a founder story that journalists actually want to run.
Your Story Is Not Your Biography
The most common mistake founders make is confusing a timeline with a narrative. They list milestones: founded the company in 2019, raised a seed round, launched version two, hired a team. That is a CV, not a story.
A story needs an arc. It needs a moment where something changed – where you saw a problem no one else was solving, or where something went wrong and forced you to rethink everything. Journalists recognise this because it mirrors how they write. Problem, unconventional solution, breakthrough. That is the shape of a story worth telling.
When we worked with Cover on the launch of Kane Williamson's sports protection brand, the story was not "former cricketer launches product." The story was: in 2012, a Dale Steyn delivery split Williamson's box in half during a Test match, and that single moment sparked a years-long mission to redesign a product category that had not meaningfully evolved in decades. That is specific. That is vivid. That is a yarn journalists want to tell.
What Makes a Founder Story Compelling
After pitching hundreds of founder stories to newsrooms across New Zealand and beyond, three things consistently separate the stories that land from the ones that get ignored.
Specificity beats polish. Vague claims about "disrupting" an industry mean nothing. A founder who can point to the exact moment, conversation, or frustration that started everything – that is gold. The more specific you are, the more credible and interesting you become. Generic stories feel like marketing. Specific ones feel true.
Vulnerability is a strategy, not a weakness. Research from Equations PR found that founders who share personal struggles in their media pitches create stories journalists actually want to cover. Admitting what you got wrong, what nearly broke you, or what you are still figuring out – that is what makes people lean in. In a world full of polished brand messaging, honesty is the most disruptive thing you can do.
Stakes make it matter. Why does this need to exist? What happens if it does not work? Who loses? If your story has no tension, it has no urgency. And if it has no urgency, a journalist has no reason to run it today instead of never.
The Difference Between a Good Story and a Good Pitch
Having a compelling founder story is only half the job. You also need to understand what makes it relevant right now – and to whom.
Recent research shows that 88% of journalists immediately disregard a pitch that does not match their coverage area. That means even the best founder story in the world will die in an inbox if it is sent to the wrong person.
A good pitch connects your story to something bigger – a trend, a shift, a cultural moment. When we helped Contented announce their $4.1 million seed round, the story was not just about the funding. It was about two female founders building a world-class AI company from Christchurch – at a time when the conversation around AI, women in tech, and regional innovation was front of mind for every business journalist in the country. The narrative had layers, and each layer gave a different journalist a reason to care.
If you are not sure whether your story has that kind of relevance, read our guide on how to tell if your story is actually news before you pitch it.
Five Mistakes That Kill Founder Stories
We see these constantly – and they are all fixable.
- Leading with the product instead of the person. Journalists want to meet the human first. What drove you to build this? What did you sacrifice? What keeps you up at night? Lead with that.
- Being too polished. If your story sounds like it was written by AI, it will feel inauthentic. The best founder stories have rough edges – moments of doubt, early failures, lessons that came the hard way.
- Trying to be everything to everyone. A story that appeals to every journalist appeals to none of them. Pick an angle and commit to it. A targeted pitch to 25 journalists who actually cover your space will outperform a blast to 500 every single time.
- Burying the interesting part. If the most compelling moment in your story is three paragraphs in, move it to the top. Journalists decide in seconds whether something is worth reading... Do not make them dig for the good stuff.
- Confusing scale with significance. A story does not have to be massive to be newsworthy. When we worked with FTN Motion on the launch of their Streetdog80 electric motorbike, the story resonated not because of the company's size, but because of the founder's conviction – a Hamilton-based manufacturer proving that New Zealand could lead in urban electric mobility. That is a small story told with big meaning.
How to Find Your Story (A Simple Exercise)
If you are sitting there thinking "I do not have a compelling story," you probably do – you just have not framed it yet. Try this:
Ask yourself three questions:
- What moment made you start this? Not the business case. The actual human moment. The frustration, the experience, the conversation that made you think: someone needs to fix this.
- What did you risk or sacrifice? Did you leave a safe career? Bet your savings? Move cities? Turn down easier money? Sacrifice creates stakes, and stakes create stories.
- What do you believe that most people in your industry do not? Contrarian conviction is magnetic. If you have a genuine point of view that challenges the status quo, that is often the most interesting thing about you.
Write down your answers in plain language – not marketing language. Then read them back. Somewhere in there is the nucleus of a story a journalist would actually want to write.
The Bigger Picture
In 2026, the media landscape has shifted. Coverage is increasingly moving from brand-centric messaging to human-centric storytelling – founder interviews, expert opinions, behind-the-scenes business narratives. At the same time, journalists are drowning in AI-generated pitches that all sound the same. The bar for getting noticed has never been higher, but the bar for standing out has never been clearer: be specific, be honest, and be human.
Your founder story is your most underrated marketing asset. It is the one thing your competitors cannot copy. It is what turns a transactional customer relationship into something people genuinely root for. And it is what gives a journalist a reason to write about you instead of the other 200 pitches in their inbox.
If you are a New Zealand founder or startup looking to get your story into the media – and you want someone who will tell you honestly whether it is ready – we would love to hear from you.
Get in touch here and we'll give you a straight answer.
